InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #7863 on Rambus (RMBS)
icon url

justmyopinion-ntim

02/10/06 5:48 PM

#7865 RE: docrew0 #7863

So Jordan waits 6 months, knows that Whyte has already ruled that Rambus did not spoliate, Transfers the case to California, and then rules that Micron has made a prima facie case for spoliation?

Perhaps Micron has nothing to go on, and they are giving them no reasons for appeal, but the BS has to end.

When is Rambus going to show a prima facie case that Micron and others have spoliated documents? The crime fraud exception seems to get applied to Rambus all the time, and it has always come up empty. Why doesn't it apply to the amigos?
icon url

smd1234

02/13/06 2:23 AM

#7927 RE: docrew0 #7863

Here is what I posted on the fool:

I started this thread in the hope I was wrong about Jordan, but I have concluded that the "best" we can hope for is a disclosure by Rambus (per the JJ order), followed by a Rambus CE-based motion to dismiss the Micron unclean hands defense, at least to the extent that defense is based on the same allegations re spoliation as Hynix made. That will force a briefing on why CE should/should not apply. [The "worst" would be a replay, in front of Jordan, of the Oct-Nov minitrial.]

The issue I had was why last week's order by JJ was necessary at all.
icon url

docrew0

02/14/06 8:23 PM

#8010 RE: docrew0 #7863

Micron Technology v. Rambus Inc. Docket 712,713,714 __02/14/2006
U.S. District Court
District of Delaware (Wilmington)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-00792-KAJ


02/14/2006 712 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California - filed by Rambus Inc., Rambus Inc.. (Graham, Mary) (Entered:_02/14/2006)

02/14/2006 713 OPENING BRIEF in Support re 712 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Rambus Inc., Rambus Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/1/2006. (Graham, Mary) (Entered:_02/14/2006)
http://investor.rambus.com/downloads/2006-02-14%20Rambus%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%2...

02/14/2006 714 APPENDIX re 712 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California, 713 Opening Brief in Support (Exhibits A through U) by Rambus Inc., Rambus Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Graham, Mary) (Entered:_02/14/2006)
Multiple Documents
Part Description
1 Main Document 98 pages
2 64 pages
3 50 pages

Sorry guys 212 pages just can't happen here.