I like the similarities between Invision and Virtra. Invision employs over 600+ people and VTSI has only a handful. SFelix, I feel that it is not a matter of the new buyers coming in, rather it is a combo of sales and overwhelming publicity. If we look at the number of airports in US that are using the Invision system, then I see that the 'total' number of potential system sales from VTSI, encompassing a huge variety of applications, will surpass the number systems deployed from Invision.
Invision is profitable and they are feeding 600+ employees based upom the 9-11 event as a 'precautionary act' at the entry to our land(airports). It is now time for the Congress, the state depts, the DOD and the homeland to look a t what we 'have' to do to provide a fail-safe and the just in case unfortunate events such as terrorism at the our homeland. VTSI provides a tool that is so viable in 'MINIMIZING' and pre, during and post event damage by providing the needed training to security professional.
Do we have a choice of not doing this? It must be done in my opinion. All terrorism is no small act and requires specialized handling which means training and training and training, and discipline and that is how our military performed in Iraq.
So, I say it again. It is a no-brainer to acquire more shares VTSI. It is at the RIGHT TIME at the RIGHT place with it product introduction. It is Invision all over again if Kelly and the boys made more splashes 'politically' and lobby the right mind and make good use of the media coverage and of course, CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS to back.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
