News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Investorman

01/08/06 11:22 AM

#197620 RE: jimmym4 #197619

The court ruled that the "evidence" Frizzy submitted was unverifiable and inadmissable and not relevant. His fuzzy math has been shown to be both inaccurate and unverifiable. The SEC ignored him and told him to come back when he had something that could be construed as other than pure speculation.

And nowhere in there does Frizzy allege that 28,000 accounts are being held by two brokerages as you assert. Even Frizzy isn't that dumb. But he is dumb enough to count the same shares twice.




icon url

Investorman

01/08/06 11:23 AM

#197621 RE: jimmym4 #197619

Time to go out for breakfast. I'll play with you later.

icon url

pantherj

01/08/06 11:34 AM

#197624 RE: jimmym4 #197619

jimmy, this is not hard. Even you can figure out immediately where the error in reasoning is in FrizBall's statement. That type of conclusion would be laughed out of a grade school Math class.
icon url

janice shell

01/08/06 6:19 PM

#197664 RE: jimmym4 #197619

That's from months ago, Jimmy. I guess you enjoy making a fool of yourself.