News Focus
News Focus
Followers 48
Posts 18920
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2001

Re: jimmym4 post# 197619

Sunday, 01/08/2006 11:22:18 AM

Sunday, January 08, 2006 11:22:18 AM

Post# of 359153
The court ruled that the "evidence" Frizzy submitted was unverifiable and inadmissable and not relevant. His fuzzy math has been shown to be both inaccurate and unverifiable. The SEC ignored him and told him to come back when he had something that could be construed as other than pure speculation.

And nowhere in there does Frizzy allege that 28,000 accounts are being held by two brokerages as you assert. Even Frizzy isn't that dumb. But he is dumb enough to count the same shares twice.




Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today