Replies to post #45988 on Fuse Science Inc (DROP)

[WondertheGr8]

HELLO !!!!!! 2013 !!! Nice post !!

[oldStruFan]

Thanks for taking the time out to write them, and reporting it back to all of us.

[CryptoRain]

Thanks rookie! I got the same response but you beat me to it. Good work!

[Baystbully]

That's what I thought. Vindication.

All those so called "experts" and non experts who wasted their time making wild assumptions of low absorption rates should have first understood how much of the actual ingredient is needed for the proper effect.

Waste of time, effort and quite frankly was perpetuating blatantly false information.
All because someone tried to tackle something they had no idea about and no business trying to explaining it in a public forum.

[kylelele]

Rookie, thanks for posting that.

I hate saying anything negative because I'm so sick of all the people just assuming its bashing, crying, whatever. (i'm not saying you are doing this). There needs to be a separate board somewhere for people who just want to praise everything and talk about the PPS being $1 soon. You seem reasonable, so I will give you my honest opinion. I'm very close to just ditching this board, which I'm sure would make many happy.

The amounts are small, as they indicated. But saying its because the initial concentatrion is small seems misleading. Noone on here was questioning that the final receptor concentration was too small on a nominal basis. Its the % that is being questioned. And that already takes into account both the initial and receptor fluid concentrations. The response you got danced around that issue. The fact is, all compounds tested had less than 25% delivery of the first round of testing they completed. I can not fathom how this would be a good thing.

I stil contend alot of this sell-off today is due to the report. It sounds like many on this board are helping to keep the prices up in light of it.

Lastly, while I was doing some research yesterday, I ran across this. thought some who are willing to do an honest analysis of where we stand might be interested in seeing it:

http://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/research/techtransfer/52213197.html