Bay, I know you are referring to me, and you have no clue what you are talking about. I did not perpetrate an ounce of false information. But as you always historically do, you just attack people instead of providing any actual analysis or reason.
I cited the report for everything I said . What I said was also later confirmed by someone who works in the pharma field. I stated where I was making assumptions or where I didn't know the industry standard. This is not giving false information.
I want you to actually do one thing besides bash people. Use that head of yours. Do research. Tell me what in that report is good news. Tell me how that level of repeatability will be ok. Tell me how absorption rates < 1/4 of those from a previous test are good. Tell me how these numbers in a perfectly controlled environment will translate to real life where people have fat, dirt, etc on their skin and the skin is not heated. Just please, i'm begging, say something intelligent instead of just constantly bashing. I actually studied your posts a few weeks ago when we really got into it, and you never say anything. Its all just attacks. Its worthless.
And if nothing else, please show me where I provided false information. I'm sure i'll just get an attack back because you can't do it. Just like two months ago when you were attacking me and I actually had to link our conversations to prove to you that I never said what you were accusing me of saying.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
