Click above and see for yourself if you have any doubts at all. During 2103 there were only 3 documents placed with the county recorder . On the top line type after you open the link type in under business Bourque Industries and hit go and you will see those 3 documents.
Then , if you do not feel like reading simply go to the bottom and you will see Floyd signed as CEO for one documenent on March 19th of 2012 and another as CEO on March 20th of 2012. The 3rd one, when he gave the 600K security interest deed of trust to the lawyer for 10 bucks was done along the same signature page of the lawyer. Look at the notary witness of the Floyd affidavit document as well with changed dates--------i know exactly why but Floyd had no legal authority to execute anything for Bourque on March 19th and March 20th of 2012. He is now liable for these documents and that of allowing our 670K corporate asset to be assigned out of our company to that lawyer Saffer. If there were another lawyer in the house they could explain as i said all along---i never was a teacher. I am done and hopefully somebody comes to the aid of the shareholders because they need it.
KZ - Excellent point ! Why would a "typo" - corrected in the final document and NOTARIZED in March of 2013 raise any questions about the deeds' legality, Sean or his tenure length ?
IMO - Misrepresentation of "typos" as FACTS does not substitue for FACTS - never has and never will...
Further expansion of a deed transfer "typo" to ASSume FACTS not in evidence is beyond my comprehension.
FOR EXAMPLE: Sean signed a document that "says he was interim CEO in March '12" - ! OMG !! I' m so-o-o-o sure !!
LOL !! C'mon ! Seriously ?!?! ;-)
Everyone who is an ACTUAL SHAREHOLDER knows Sean had not even traveled to AZ or met JB until May '12 and did not get any type of contract or title until July '12...which was VP to the CEO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
