AI
Friday, May 03, 2013 3:24:46 PM
KZ - Excellent point ! Why would a "typo" - corrected in the final document and NOTARIZED in March of 2013 raise any questions about the deeds' legality, Sean or his tenure length ?
IMO - Misrepresentation of "typos" as FACTS does not substitue for FACTS - never has and never will...
Further expansion of a deed transfer "typo" to ASSume FACTS not in evidence is beyond my comprehension.
FOR EXAMPLE: Sean signed a document that "says he was interim CEO in March '12" - ! OMG !! I' m so-o-o-o sure !!
LOL !! C'mon ! Seriously ?!?!
Everyone who is an ACTUAL SHAREHOLDER knows Sean had not even traveled to AZ or met JB until May '12 and did not get any type of contract or title until July '12...which was VP to the CEO.
Brother....I don't even know what to say....
IMO - Misrepresentation of "typos" as FACTS does not substitue for FACTS - never has and never will...
Further expansion of a deed transfer "typo" to ASSume FACTS not in evidence is beyond my comprehension.
FOR EXAMPLE: Sean signed a document that "says he was interim CEO in March '12" - ! OMG !! I' m so-o-o-o sure !!
LOL !! C'mon ! Seriously ?!?!
Everyone who is an ACTUAL SHAREHOLDER knows Sean had not even traveled to AZ or met JB until May '12 and did not get any type of contract or title until July '12...which was VP to the CEO.
Brother....I don't even know what to say....
