News Focus
News Focus
icon url

grego68

05/03/13 8:03 AM

#151618 RE: tob999 #151617

when you short a stock you only have so long to cover...you don't get months to cover, it's only a matter of days, so the ones shorting either lost a shitpot full of money, or they covered. it's one or one or the other. shorters don't get forever to pay when they they can't cover
icon url

sunspotter

05/03/13 8:06 AM

#151621 RE: tob999 #151617

"How could they cover 500M-1BN NSS when SRGE longs are not selling?"

There are no shorts, naked or otherwise, on obvious scam SRGE.

Where on Earth did that ludicrous and entirely fictional figure of 500 million to 1 billion shares come from?

It's no wonder scams like SRGE can thrive with the amount of palpable and frankly rather pathetic misinformation that gets repeated and accepted without the slightest foundation for it in the first place.

icon url

BillEvans80

05/03/13 8:22 AM

#151624 RE: tob999 #151617

If there were naked shorts then there would have been people complaining that they did not receive the dividend. I saw no such complaints, therefore no naked shorts.
icon url

EarnestDD

05/03/13 10:59 AM

#151651 RE: tob999 #151617

Fictional Shorts don't need to be covered.

And Fictional ownership of mines can't be sold.

Such is the SRGE Scam.

jmo