Replies to post #15623 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[BondGekko]

ams not news to me, it was said by goldberg in the c.c., now you say the insider selling could be because they fear negative news, well what did they fear before the ericy settlement was announced they were selling all throughout that ordeal

u say that is all examples of what could have made them sell, well what caused them to sell before the ericy settlement

u still have not addressed the insider sales before the ericy settlement, why not qualify your posts with, this is what i believe but i was wrong in the past

ams remember since i have been following this company, i have noticed one thing, they are very conservative, they never go out on a limb on their c.c.'s, news is always to the point and never hype, clearly this is something to be lauded with the scandals we had last year

so because of that i don't believe that the nok samsung deal is being hyped by them, they implied that it is almost impossible that nok and samsung would go to arbirtration, now when this cautious company says that it leads me to believe it will happen

also you are forgetting all of the recent insider buys since january

[jaykayjones]

ams: "legally binding agreement had a get out of jail clause, by allowing arbitration."

In my contract drafting experience, all contracts, which are legally binding, have clauses that deal with the resolution of disputes that can arise legitimately during the period of contract fulfillment.

Typically, if the parties cannot resolve a dispute through negotiation between themselves, then arbitration is the next choice for resolution through third party involvment (rather than the court).

Also, it doesn't mean that the arbitrator will 'split the difference' if the issues in contention are well defined in the contract.

In short, arbitration is standard operating practice in my experience. JK