News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gotinearly

03/17/13 1:54 PM

#51638 RE: Joe808 #51636

It all depends on the value at the time the agreement was negotiated...not when it was finalized.
icon url

amillhereamillthere

03/17/13 2:09 PM

#51644 RE: Joe808 #51636

The interesting thing is why would the plantiff and atty agree to this ? Its probably because they got a better deal and thats why they settled!
icon url

mscolleen2003

03/17/13 2:09 PM

#51645 RE: Joe808 #51636

It would be too easy to seize assets to satisfy a judgement, why mess with the stock? but you never know, you could be 100% right. But I will tell you, I sure would not take on stock that I was going to lose my butt on,when I new there were physical assets to be had.
icon url

stock_MD

03/17/13 2:29 PM

#51648 RE: Joe808 #51636

It reads in "excess of" ... Why is it hard to read?
in excess of $125,000

jmo
icon url

MrMajik55

03/17/13 6:06 PM

#51666 RE: Joe808 #51636

BMSN is listed on the pinkies. Both parties involved know the meaning of how risky that is. So to protect the client's best interest their attorney most likely considered both the up and down side of the stock and negotiated on the down side (lowest PPS). My best guess is Koos saw this as a way to get out from under this lawsuit and agreed as to him the stock is just printed paper, not his bank account regardless of how the clinical trials progress.

If you put yourself in Koos' position you would most likely agree to a similar offer.
icon url

Joefyffe

03/17/13 6:57 PM

#51675 RE: Joe808 #51636

At 10M shares, they have the gamble opportunity to make $500,000 @ $.05 or even $1M @ $.10. Or even sell off half @ $.05 to recover debt owed, then ride the remaining shares to possibly make a large profit beyond what was owed. I'm sure they weighed this opportunity verses risk of being able to possibly get less than what was owed. I'm also sure they got to see all current cards on the table to indicate the company's potential before agreeing on the deal.
icon url

ssmitho

03/17/13 7:02 PM

#51677 RE: Joe808 #51636

Why would koos offer so many shares? What was the lawsuit about?