News Focus
News Focus
icon url

flptrnkng

12/15/12 3:05 PM

#207300 RE: loanranger #207298

So, it appears he told Brigg one thing

and filed something entirely different in the 10Q, bearing in mind SOX requirements.

Interesting.
icon url

BRIG_88

12/15/12 3:06 PM

#207301 RE: loanranger #207298

GEE. Imagine that? Business condiitons change and he and the company adapt accordingly.....he has decided to slash costs in conjunction with boosting fuel output......looks like some sound decisions to me.....just adaptin'
icon url

stocker11

12/15/12 5:02 PM

#207307 RE: loanranger #207298

how can you construct new processors without inventory?

If that was true, there would be WAY too much money invested in inventory at 9/30 given historical and even the frothiest expected revenue levels for Q4.)

icon url

Rawnoc

12/15/12 8:32 PM

#207319 RE: loanranger #207298

Increasing the part-time hourly staff while decreasing more expensive costs.

They can hire 3 new $20/hour part-time guys working 20 hours a week doesn't mean they aren't reducing expenses. Those new guys, as an example, comes out to $4,800 a month. AKA piss.

As an example from the 10Q:

"reduction of accounting and legal service fees"
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8904315

Accountants and lawyers tend to make more money than part-time blue collar opeators.

"we are anticipating getting multiple machines producing, cutting costs, and increasing sales to meet our goal of cash-flow positive"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=81323167