News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JeffreyHF

10/26/05 11:56 AM

#130528 RE: sjratty #130527

sjratty, would the fact that only Tantivy patents have been placed at issue have any affect on the potential MFN ramifications?
icon url

hookrider

10/26/05 11:57 AM

#130529 RE: sjratty #130527

sjratty:"IDCC does not want to accept a deal that results in a bad deal with everyone else."

IMO, that leads me to think LU will get close to what IDCC wants but still be able to say it's a win/win for both sides. IMO, like NOK, LU doesn't want a all out win by IDCC. That would open ever door IDCC has been knocking on.
icon url

laranger

10/26/05 12:05 PM

#130531 RE: sjratty #130527

Most believe that the Markman results and the deposition concerning destruction of critical evidence gives IDCC the edge.

Shouldn't these two issues weigh in favor of settlement?
icon url

my3sons87

10/26/05 12:07 PM

#130532 RE: sjratty #130527

Sjratty, you forgot to mention the Markman report findings of the judge.
icon url

ellismd

10/26/05 12:35 PM

#130540 RE: sjratty #130527

I was playing tit for tat with my3sons. The tone and intent of the post responding to the forementioned email is just a friendly wager between me and my3sons. Despite your short summary you still can get in on the action.