Replies to post #65574 on Southridge Enterprises Inc (SRGE)

[zambia123]

Duh Chairman Shaipiro,

They haven't done anything because they have verified the info duh.

[samsamsamiam]

You would hope serving this TURKEY on a silver platter to the SEC might get some reaction. Perhaps they will wake from their Thanksgiving Tryptophan overdose and suspend this before more victims get sucked into this nonsense of a NYSE company buyout and quarterly dividends. geesh

[grego68]

that post is so full of holes it's not even funny. You are using speculation as fact. You have no clue about the financing, just opinion with no fact behind your statement. that whole letter is nothing more than wild accusations with ZERO fact.

BGL has NEVER owned Cinco Minas. The titles have NEVER been in BGL's name therefore BGL has NO VALID CLAIM to Cinco Minas! You can even look at the Concession titles BGL proudly displays as theirs on their website. Who's name is on them? NOT BGL'S!

Until "recently" Alex SMID led the company? 2007 is recently? REALLY? LOLOL

The financing comes from a private company. Not all private companies have been heard of.

Ownership of the concessions and mine ARE NOT in dispute. The MMR has verified time and time again that SRGE owns the concessions and property. It doesn't matter what any website says. The ultimate determination and final say to any mine ownership or concession titles is in fact the MMR. Before you accuse SRGE of fraud, you should have called the MMR for the REAL information.

In essence, all of the information that you are presenting to the Chairman are grossly incorrect as I'm sure the SEC is well aware of.

[workofmajik]

I think you misunderstood what u read and all your issues have been disputed. SRGE says. 20 divy if they sell cinco no promise has been made to that divy without deal. The. 00003 divy has been paid as promised. Everything SRGE has been PR is been handled. The fact is you stretch by trying to tie a fraud to this company when in all honesty you don't know for sure which IMO is the worst of frauds you want people to trade a stock on your believe which seems agenda hidden. You claim many letters to SEC and no action could it maybe just be that its legit and that's why no action. As far as I can see news and promises are fulfilling by company so I will hold.
The true manipulation the sec should look at is false claims that try to be posted as truth to manipulate price. All we as investors can go by is company issued PR and news any other claims outside of those channels are agenda driven

FACT SRGE SAID. 0003 DIVY PAID YES. GO CURRENT WITH OTC YES. REVENUES YES SHARE BUYBACK YES (I KNOW I KNOW TA GAGGED BUT WEBSITE. OTC AND PR CONFIRM) BUYING MINES YES. KEEPING SHAREHOLDERS INFORMED YES AND MUCH MORE SO SORRY IF I DONT HEED UOUR WARNING BUT I THINK YOUR WRONG

So far SRGE has kept and keeps earning my trust

[tob999]

SEC threat rubbish imo! LMAO you call 2007 recently????!

who until recently

[tob999]

Point 1) will be cleared up with one phone call to Tatiana Sigler Baca at MMR. All the other points are just opinion..and really whacky conspiracies imo! LMAO!

[MrDemas]

"Who until recently", like how recent?

[Balltilian]

I dont see everyone else concerned, about an imaginary sec review. JMO

[I-Glow]

WOW!!! Awesome post Terry! I have always thought the SRGE pump and Dump was almost identical to the SAEI scam.

Then SRGE released the most recent over the top Press Release and I knew the same people are behind it.

HUGE BUYOUT - SAEI it was the Prokhorov buyout, with SRGE it was the $600 million bbuyout by either Goldcorp or Southern Copper.

Everything between SAEI and SRGE is identical as will be the ending which will be another halt.

IG

[no_brag_just_fact]

That story was not credible at .0024 and still not credible at .0133....

NB