Replies to post #104072 on Pacific Gold Corp fka PCFG

[TRAPPER JIM]

Thanks blue.I didnt see your post from a few days ago until just now. http://client-email.com/dockets/PCFG/PCFG%20Doc%20052%20Mot%20to%20Dismiss%20Memo.pdf
THE COURT SHOULD GRANT COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANTS'
MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS TWO THROUGH SEVEN OF THE
SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS

[LMPA]

That is really an interesting thought, no doubt that PCFG have handled things to their benefit through this whole thing but your statement makes one wonder that if they drove down price/closed up shop until this was over on purpose to show the courts it doesn't have the value BME was suggesting?

I do not have conspiracy theories that PCFG is actually doing great behind the scenes but doing this on purpose but it sure can't hurt to decide to not fix alot of problems while someone wants a piece of the pie...

[LMPA]

Just had a thought, and I bet Trapper has the answer - what was the share price that BME received at that time? My memory is foggy to say the least and I do not remember any of the details of their agreement so if I am off base here, feel free to straighten me out. Sure would be convenience that we were sitting at that instead of .08 during all this now isn't it...

[Lowjack]

What area of law do you practice?

[chevy56]

blue dog



I`m not a attorney, but would say so....

chevy56

Good move PCFG