News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Gold_Icon

11/16/12 12:56 PM

#47791 RE: Gatz #47789

First of all they are not being ridiculed, they are being exposed, and that statement is all blah blah blah, if they had made that statement at least a week ago when they already knew the delay and that they were not gonna PR the results on the 15, maybe and I say MAYBE we would understand but to wait until the last moment to PR what they gave us is just an insult to investors, so no , we are calling BS on that Facebook statement.
icon url

justgetnby

11/16/12 12:57 PM

#47792 RE: Gatz #47789

curious-comments anyone at bottom of your post.....did you write that or was that part of WDRP post?
because if its WDRPs invitation they are not gonna like what they get as if it mattered anyway-they are just gonna brush you off like it shows on everyone else
icon url

gharma

11/16/12 1:51 PM

#47794 RE: Gatz #47789


We think the reasons for extending this period is important and will only add value to the project for shareholders.
- FB Wanderport



Now how does one understand that ?
Because it was (again) broken and non-functional, which must have been the "reason(s?) for extending", of course it was important (necessary)!

No in-house numbers
No respect for shareholders
Only empty, unsatisfied promises

Where are the in-house numbers ?
Where are the pictures/video ?

Where is the respect due to other people, to shareholders ? Rude flip comments will get the company nowhere . . . and they are now in the public record for all future, potential investors to see. Way to go !

Where is proof that anything is happening with Intertek ?

Which "Wanderport" is that FB anyway ? The one with the WDRP issue, or that one that is an alias of AB's Canadian company ?
icon url

Hockmir

11/17/12 3:26 AM

#47799 RE: Gatz #47789

this is the unknown and our technology is special because of this.



What an amazing thing for them to say. Exactly what is it that they think is unknown at this time?

Microwaves? - Nope, been known and manipulated in the RF engineering community for nearly a century.

Microwave heating phenomenolgy? At least 70 years for that one.

Magnetron tubes? Well, lets see, they were first invented by GE in the 1920's, and then reduced to practical devices by the En glish during World War 2 as a means of generating high power radar pulses.

Water? - I understand that water has been around a long time.

Plumbing? - Been around for a couple of centuries.

Hot water? - Been around since at least ancient Greece.

Electricity? - I guess that somewhere between Ben Franklin and Nikola Tesla, folks have come to grips with the existence and uses of electricity.

So, where exactly is this unknown stuff that we are facing, like grim-jawed angels of technology?

About the only thing that is unknown, and which makes some difference to the operation of a microwave water heating device is the choice of operating frequency. The common commodity grade magnetrons which can be gotten easily are designed to operate somewhat off of the optimum energy transfer frequency to provide the necessary cooking environment in a microwave oven. In this application, would it be more effective to have a magnetron custom designed and manufactured to improve the energy transfer efficiency to the water flowing through the heater, or, perhaps this is handled by the super-secret and sacred MMMCCCHHHUUU or whatever they call it that effectuates the transfer of energy from a (perhaps) 70% efficient magnetron to the water.

Or, perhaps the unknown is how you start with an energy efficiency of about 70% in the magnetron and couple more than 100% of the supplied energy to the alleged water which your alleged heater is allegedly heating, when you can find an extension cord that fits it.

I would love to hear the response to these points. Wanderport? Robert? Anyone? Buehler? Anyone?
icon url

Gatz

11/27/12 11:02 AM

#47960 RE: Gatz #47789

Comments from Facebook:

Mike:
you have been dangling the carrot for years.. I stopped believing the BS a long time ago.. I still hold some WDRP i got on the cheap in hopes that someday the miracle will happen.. but I dont really have any confidence it will.. I hope I am wrong..
November 20 at 9:47am

Ben:
I hope this is not an excuse to delay the numbers past December 6th. Can the masses have a picture of the heater with Robert at Intertek in the interim?
November 20 at 10:19am via mobile

Wanderport Corporation:
one of the pictures has Robert with the unit below, you can sort of see the tubes or pipes sticking out
November 20 at 10:22am · Like..Ben Gordon You can kind of see it you are right. But this product is the future of WDRP not Robert, it should be the main focus of the picture.
November 20 at 11:59am via mobile

Jim:
The very bottom photo appears to be a large cabinet, and judging from the size of the lock on the door, I'd guess those were 1/2" soft copper compression fittings on the side. That would be enough to maybe supply a full bath and a dishwasher. I'm hoping to see that the testing results will confirm that a unit with 3/4" fittings will supply a medium house/large apartment (i.e. two full baths). That's where the money is. And so is mine. Dyin' for December the 6th!
November 20 at 4:43pm

David:
That medium house depending on what temperature zone it's in, is going to require up 300 Amp service. Most homes only have 100 to 200 amp service.
November 21 at 8:32am

Jim:
A multi-chambered cavity with multiple magnetrons bombarding each chamber should take no more than 30 amps. Think microwave oven. Very large cavity - 1 magnetron on a 15 amp circuit and probably only using 1/2 that. Now consider a six-pack of Bud Light Platinum (or your choice of beverage) bottles being hit by a number of LOWER WATTAGE magnetrons as the water flows from one bottle to the other, raising the temp as it passes through each cavity. Get it?!!! The temp needs to be raised from 55 degrees (roughly avg ground temp) to 130-140 degrees. And with a point of use heater, that water would never go down in temperature as with a tank-type heater (recovery time). I think it can be done! Banking on it. We'll see Dec. 6.
November 22 at 8:19pm

David:
No Jim sorry, I don't drink Bud and I don't get it either. Are you saying a whole house unit should only take 30 amps or a point of use? A tank type electric will require a 30 amps so there's no way 30 amps will be enough for a whole house tankless. Tankless electric water heaters are most suitable for point of use because of their high current draw. Unless you live in a very warm climate a whole house tankless unit may require 120 amps @ 240 volts with #8 wire! A multi-chambered cavity with multiple magnetrons isn't going to change that. I'd love to be proven wrong on this, and all it's going to take is for Wanderport to change the laws of Physics.
We'll see.................................
Sunday at 10:08pm