News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sunspotter

09/06/12 2:30 AM

#45431 RE: Gatz #45430

"we must assure everything is properly backed-up and factual prior to each news release to avoid doubt or dispute"

Translation from WDRP-speak into English follows:

"Now that the AMF and SEC are crawling all over us, we can't tell blatant lies like we used to; we try to get away with it on FaceBook, but even that may come back to bite us.

But stick with it, long-suffering marks. Now that we have removed the chill (not that we will actually officially confirm this) we still have a few million more shares to dump as long as you will let us play this game."


icon url

BeerIsGood

09/06/12 8:12 AM

#45435 RE: Gatz #45430

DTC Chill was the first hurdle and now old news!

How is it old news? Just because WDRP is done talking about it? WAS the chill removed? Where does WDRP and/or DTC say the chill was removed? Nowhere. Maybe what is the chill is a better question. I thought chill was because DTC would not electronically clear securities of WDRP. Do they now? Don't look like it on my end. Is it in processes? No idea. When a chill is removed TDA is all over it just like a few this summer. Anyone know if TDA allows WDRP trades like any other pinky?
icon url

gharma

09/06/12 10:23 AM

#45443 RE: Gatz #45430

however; we must assure everything is properly backed-up and factual prior to each news release to avoid doubt or dispute

It is simple Andrew ! No brain needed. Just add the words:

The following are our in-house evaluation measurements showing rate of flow of water in gallons/minute (or liters per second, or whatever), water input and exit temperatures in degrees centigrade, and electrical line power consumption in watts per second (or Joules per second, or amps or ) presented in both graphic and tabular forms, followed by our estimation of energy input that was transferred to the water as heat.

I am sure you can figure out that constitutes a sufficient disclaimer. Just adjust the words, cut and paste the data,

AND HONOR YOUR PROMISES !
icon url

Gatz

09/06/12 2:10 PM

#45492 RE: Gatz #45430

Recent questions and answers:

Investor:
Great to see Wanderport moving forward. Does this post mean that you will need to get verification from a 3rd party test lab before releasing any numbers?2 hours ago

Wanderport Corporation: That is being worked on presently according to Robert


Was that a yes or a no?