News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mugwumps88

08/02/12 10:08 AM

#70253 RE: Sparks100 #70249

He needs a lawyer he can afford. I heard Lionel Hutz works for popsicles.

Good detective work Sparks, we would all love to know who this new poster is and what his motivations are. It would seem he is dying to get the news out as he could not wait to get an account on Ihub and post his info before it was even public.
icon url

Nikodemos

08/02/12 10:10 AM

#70254 RE: Sparks100 #70249

Thanks for the thorough analysis including the motivations
of timing, absence of the file suggesting advance notice,
& the apparent deliver of MORE RUBBISH by Humphries.

The LOST WONDER, among his other names, as he COULD NOT BE
SERVED for a VERY LONG TIME by HLNT has now seemingly attempted
EVERY TACTIC to forestall the inevitable & clog-up the court
system.

Of note was a recent settlement by a company reportedly owing
NIR $6mm. The settlement went for $1mm & so it is fairly clear
to me that if HLNT were not so insistent on defending themselves
they might likely score a similar settlement at will if they'd
have felt it was the best they could do.

I, for one, am glad they have NOT!!

HLNT


icon url

GENEO1

08/02/12 10:11 AM

#70255 RE: Sparks100 #70249

THANKS SPARKS100 FOR THE UPDATE, as it appears to be another stalling by NIR, IMHO Humphries is being led by the NIR people, as he has no money.

WOW, there are some in the world who do not want HLNT to prosper into a great company with many products, UNBELIEVEABLE/

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HLNT
icon url

wise2u

08/02/12 10:13 AM

#70256 RE: Sparks100 #70249

Sounds like a complete waste of time. Just another stall tactic to tie up HTI for another year. We're learning how to make our legal system works against us by abusing certain protections. At this point in time, just another mosquito. Thanks for keeping us informed. IMO
icon url

hot-penguin

08/02/12 10:22 AM

#70261 RE: Sparks100 #70249

1) Sparks - you're a machine, buddy!

2) Awesome work as usual.

3) Sounds like the timing of this was to try to disrupt the upcoming (big) news. No surprise there. Do you think it will have any effect?

4) A Judge actually had to ask a lawyer if he was really a lawyer?? That's incredible.
icon url

Sparks100

08/02/12 11:09 AM

#70273 RE: Sparks100 #70249

HLNT/NIR/.... Lawsuits Followup:

Humphries latest adventure in litigation was ill-advised. As yet, HLNT has not mentioned anything about any criminal action. Humphries may have tipped the scale there, and could be tempting HLNT to support any Criminal actions brought against Humphries, Walters and Ribotsky. If I were the other two, I would be furious with Humphries, but if either of them supported Humphries in this, then they will be deserving of any criminal actions.

In the New York case, it was delayed (stayed) for 30 days while Walters found himself a new lawyer. That should end tomorrow, as that is technically the 30th day. If he doesn't come up with a lawyer, he will be pro-se (representing himself) and his companies, Monarch Bay and STI Group, will be in default (subject to sanctions and immediate summary judgement by HLNT). The next status conference is slated for August 7th, and it is going to be a very interesting one at this point. As this was the order by the Judge (Document #180 on the SCROLL system, dated 06/29/2012), this indicated that the Depositions of both Walters and Humphries had been completed. Would love to have witnessed those depositions, if both men answered truthfully, their testimonies should have solidified HLNT's case. With the 30 day stay, which though inconvenient, HLNT has had time to prepare for this next week, and review any documents that they may have received in discovery from Walters. It is not expected that Humphries has provided any documents, he has on two occasasions stated that he has turned over all the documents to the SEC/FBI. This is known to be a falsehood, as he provided some SSEV bankstatement information as his evidence in a response against HLNT in his prior bankruptcy filing attempt. For that falsehood, he is subject to charges of perjury in the New York case.

None the less, once the stay is lifted, the New York case should pick up speed after the next status conference, and we can actually expect some progress on these cases and their issues and for them to start wrapping up. A trial date should be set now for the New York case, which could be anytime in September or October, but very likely around the 1st of October. As this time frame approaches, we can expect an increase in the discussion of settlement offers, even though it probably won't be known to shareholders and investors that this is happening.

While the appeals are yet to be heard, there may be issues hearings revolving around them as well over the next month or two, appellate judges are not prone to waiting until the last minute to deal with something. Expect PWC's appeal to be immediately dismissed, and HLNT has a good chance of winning theirs and getting the NIR group and Funds reinstated as a principals in the fraud.

In summary, the dark cloud over HLNT that NIR created is beginning to break up now. Looking forward to HLNT prevailing and putting this all to rest, so that HLNT can completely focus on sales with its JV partner and on the production processes.

The opinions expressed herein are my own and investors should conduct their own due diligence, allowing them to form their own opinions and to be able to make appropriate investment decisions.
icon url

rainmaker2

08/02/12 11:32 AM

#70276 RE: Sparks100 #70249

Busted!

Sparks100, your dd for us and legal dissections are priceless!

I hope GD is following today so he'll see how much light you shed on HLNT. We all owe you so much.

I think today might be our day here, where the pps takes off.

Remember how they used to say goodnight on the Waltons after an eventful day?

"Goodnight Johnboy!" "Goodnight Jimbob!"
icon url

pdgood

08/02/12 12:30 PM

#70289 RE: Sparks100 #70249

No interest in the case dude?

A new lawsuit filed with HLNT, Robinson and Foster as Defendants and the Complaint claims are not the primary interest? Does that make sense?

Is the important fact this?

"Interesting thing about finding the case, at first, while the case header existed, the complaint had not been posted to the court records on PACER. In fact the complaint document was not posted to the site until about 15 to 20 minutes later. This indicates that the new poster had advance information and didn't actually find the case on PACER. This is confirmed by the wrong case number that was cited by him also."

Or this? Is this validation of my view of this SHAM? Are they lies or facts?lies. Now the light is on those facts. Just like the FORECLOSURE they are now in court fightin.

"I won't rehash the case here, it is almost as though it were a synopsis of PD's postings here on IHUB and other places, and if you have read them, you practically know the whole case."

Ya concluded this? Based on what?

"Back to the case. This should be thrown out in 3 months or less. There are reasons for this that I will not go into here, don't want to give Hump any advice on how to handle his litigation"

Two things for the rational folks to consider here and a couple ta wonder about.

The HLNT CEO that hatched this game is fraud felon Mel Robinson. He's sued fraud felon Humphries before as has Foster. Tryin ta make nonsense claims stick in court is the Robinson way. You can find plenty ta DD on that. The name game I've referred to is always a big part a that exercise. Now we also have the obvious exit strategy all rational folks are watching unfold. Pay very close attention to the company names in the Complaint. If Humphries and Espinoza are smart they will stick with the facts. They'll question any name game tactics as they are used. As I've posted before, eyes are on the group known as "Mel's Arkansas Group." Not just mine. Eyes are on Humphries and Espinoza too. Humphries has several avenues ta take that are winners. Number one is that Robinson seems to have highjacked HLNT. There is no Humphries resignation as required by the Idaho Sec of State. There was no election of the present Directors of HLNT. Robinson appointed them. Plenty more will come on these types of facts.

So how is it that I knew all this was comin down? How did I know what was comin down at NIR long before it happened? Are all these dudes reportin ta me? Did Coats and Robinson provide info to me? How about Ribotsky at NIR? Did I simply make everythin up and lawyers got so enamered with it all that they made claims in court with no underlyin documentation? How did jimboy get his info? Does it even matter now? The info will stand on it's own.

This also interests me.

"Any bets as to why the timing of yesterday? People should be careful as to how they are being used."

I agree. People need ta pay attention. I've been sayin that for quite some time. They need to examine the facts on HLNT. Any claim can be made. Those claims are in the body of the new Complaint. Better pay attention to those claims. The court will. PWC will. The lawyers will. It's obvious that some have been readin and preparin.