News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BTH

06/09/12 9:47 PM

#143554 RE: iwfal #143553

Are you inferring that the MARQUEE trial for '197 will not meet efficacy when unblinded?
icon url

jq1234

06/09/12 10:46 PM

#143555 RE: iwfal #143553

I don't see why OS HR>0.8 is a big deal in this case. This is NSCLC against Tarceva not placebo. As long as stat significant, I really don't care if HR> or <0.8. Tarceva got approved with HR>0.8 against placebo.
icon url

bladerunner1717

06/09/12 11:37 PM

#143557 RE: iwfal #143553

Hey Clark,

Let's assume, for arguments sake, that the Phase III is a success with an HR <.80. What would you have to conclude about your analysis? In other words, if you turn out to be wrong, how would you critique your own analysis?


Bladerunner