Replies to post #63138 on MediaG3 (MDGC)

[colemano]

That's funny. That is the normal course of business. Your point is a non sequitur.

[colemano]

Why are you asking whether there is "actually a MediaG3 office at that location"?

I thought you were going to follow up on that excellant research?

Thank you for the excellent research regarding the new address MediaG3 is claiming. I will follow up on Monday.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76206613

[jbsliverer]

But, uhh, uhm, wait, it's "normal course of business" to not give notice to your landlord or shareholders, skip out on the rent, don't even attempt to cover tracks until it's brought up on a board or get exposed, and work with rolling STOP signs and rolling Black Skulls, conveniently leave out all of the address, dubious share selling on watch with the SEC and DTCC, bad notices with the local BBB of some rinky dink DBA, and probably owing the state in which the stock is registered in, at least having problems keeping a simple thing current.

Just give Val a break, "normal course of business". Riiiight.

[colemano]

That sounds completely plausible:

He updated that page within an hour of my mentioning it.

The CEO of MDGC must have seen your IHub post and immediately jump to action. LOL!

[cyberbullymouse]

I keep suggesting that their presence at that address may simply be a co-lo'd or leased server, allowing MDGC/Val to think that justifies claiming that their "operations" are run out of that location.

If he were to provide a Suite #, then it would be easier enough to show that the address belongs to another entity, perhaps a datacenter or some other service where MDGC has a box, or a virtual private server.

If that's the case, some office/lab/r&d center! LOL