News Focus
News Focus
icon url

exwannabe

03/09/12 4:25 PM

#138511 RE: DewDiligence #138510

This would be consistent with WPI’s public acknowledgement on a recent investor webcast that they did not have much product on hand at the time of the launch.



Kind of curious how that jives with the statements made to the Court in the injunction appeal about having $109 trillion or so of product about to spoil.

As an aside, I would note that the defendant's actions in court are one of the decision factors on treble damages.
icon url

Rocky3

03/09/12 10:59 PM

#138533 RE: DewDiligence #138510

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told that [the Lovenox TRx numbers] will no longer be given out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Told by whom? Was there a stated reason?



Told by my broker who had gotten the info from an internal analyst who said that corporate policy had changed so that no individual numbers would be provided in the future.

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was told that the latest numbers showed…
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which period do your latest numbers correspond to?



The "most recent" - that is the only information provided. I didn't push the issue since it was clear that the firm was not going to give much info in the future. I had been very fortunate to get as much info as I had gotten in the past since I don't pay really big bucks to the broker and they don't have that much reason to keep me happy. Maybe you can get the information in the future.