Kind of curious how that jives with the statements made to the Court in the injunction appeal about having $109 trillion or so of product about to spoil.
Excellent point. I'd like to hear more thoughts on this as well. Did they really cite $109 trillion?
Good catch. I was thinking the same thing, that not having much product on hand doesn't jibe with what Watson asserting in court that they had a large but perishable inventory on hand.
Good catch. I was thinking the same thing, that not having much product on hand doesn't jibe with what Watson asserted in court, that they had a large but perishable inventory on hand.