Replies to post #122492 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[whizzeresq]

Hookrider--This is my last post on the topic of whether Nokia's lawyers somehow improperly used sealed documents or information. You just posted:

"When Judge Lynn opened the PSJs, NOK found their cornucopia and off they trotted to DE with their motion to invalidate IDCC's prime 3G patents. JMHO-Oso"
IMO you are right. Now to my point NOK was not suppose to know this. Only there Lawyers were. IMO that's what Judge Lynn said."

I just reviewed the docket from Judge Lynn's court. Both the Markman Report and Partial Summary Judgment Order were vacated and the seal was removed by Judge Lynn so that those rulings were made available to the public at large. If anyone wanted, they could have put those rulings on a billboard in Times Square.

I have not had an opportunity to review the Deleware action to determine whether Oso is correct in that Nokia is using rulings from the Ericy case to support their attack on IDCC's 3G patents. Even if they are, it doesn't help them since those rulings are now vacated.

[e5oo]

hook,

it's my understanding that their lawyers ARE Nok. it's the same thing. you can't separate one from the other in any attorney client relationship. imo

"Now to my point NOK was not suppose to know this. Only there Lawyers were."