News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Ghors

08/06/05 12:14 PM

#122349 RE: IDoCare #122347

Generally yes. However, once the info is known, if NOK can obtain it by any other means, they might still be able to use it. So, the answer to your question probably depends on whether NOK can get the same info or doc from another legitimate source. Mere knowledge of the contents won't help NOK except in their efforts to obtain it from another source.

As Wiz said, at this point, the fruit of the poison tree evidence will no longer be available to NOK

Got to go.

IMO Ghors
icon url

Hardball

08/07/05 11:32 AM

#122414 RE: IDoCare #122347

Idocare:IDCC won an "important" MORAL VICTORY

with the reversal of the Judge's decision to permit NOK to intervene.

However, it remains to be seen if it has any practical implications. If it doesn't I do find it curious as to WHY the appeal was even pursued? I suspect that IDCC lawyers feel that this must have some import for future IDCC cases and/or IDCC NOK dealings.

I can't believe we spent whatever it cost to pursue this issue merely out of intellectual curiousity or to achieve a MORAL Victory only?

Comments?