News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mattu

01/27/03 10:35 AM

#19714 RE: Churak #19711

You offer valid points, but I simply disagree with them.

I think the two can exist, as long as I'm not using the site to promote my stocks; or participating directly in discussions about the stocks on their specific boards where the public goes to view those discussions. Nobody except people who are crazy enough to bookmark me even know my board exists. It has a whopping 64 boardmarks.

On a board of my own, there is no reason I shouldn't be able to discuss some stocks.

Me, I'd rather participate on a site where I know the guy running the place has a clue about the stock market in the first place. Some folks out there running sites don't understand, trade, or have a clue what the stock market is.

The issue has been beat. We'll just let time tell.

icon url

Bob Zumbrunnen

01/27/03 11:25 AM

#19720 RE: Churak #19711

We used a lot of the same terminology and I hadn't even seen your post when I wrote my last one.

We must be right. <g>

icon url

The Original dpb5!

01/27/03 6:44 PM

#19757 RE: Churak #19711

Matt, for your benefit, I have to agree with Bob and Churak. In the longterm scheme of things, it'd be best for you to pick an alias on OTHER message boards. Something like "MarthaStewart" (you know, something non descript and vague) and post your personal stock picks and comments there.

That way, you will keep yourself closed to criticism from anyone who thinks that you MAY have "an agenda".

i.e. MMMARY?