News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Crazy Money

01/09/12 10:05 PM

#10442 RE: StockBang #10441

Stop blaming fake shorties.... and the float is NOT LOCKED... lolzzz
icon url

drwright68

01/09/12 10:06 PM

#10443 RE: StockBang #10441

The 8k's indicate they were able to short.
icon url

svt1159

01/09/12 10:08 PM

#10446 RE: StockBang #10441

I believe this is exactly what they're doing.
icon url

rverboatgambler

01/10/12 6:30 AM

#10511 RE: StockBang #10441

I've been wondering that too- Companies on the Pinks are exempt from filings; We have to wonder who has been loading up all these shares the last 2 weeks. I dont think its only members of iHub on the bid. If Altrinsic applies to relist on the OTCBB for starters, THEN they have to disclose all major positions. Their TA has this info at his fingertips, but wont share it unless directed by the Company or regulators.

Rver
icon url

Fast Flyer 03

01/10/12 6:39 AM

#10514 RE: StockBang #10441

Yes and they most probably have knowing "BD". "Shorting against the box" occurs when an investor sells-short securities that they already own. The name is derived from the thought of selling-short the same securities that are held in a safe deposit box.
The strategy behind this approach is to lock-in "paper" profits on the investor's long position, without having to sell the stock. If the price of the stock held by the investor increases or decreases, then the profits, or loss, on the short position are offset by the profit, or loss, on the long position.
The IRS views "shorting against the box" as a "constructive sale" of a long position, which triggers a taxable event unless certain conditions are met.
In essence "BD" has nothing to lose on this but much to gain as they are offsetting the loss of the long position by leaving those shares alone. But are making huge profits by shorting on the low end. And just waiting to go back as they will make money all the way back up.