Replies to post #3143 on Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[goodluck]

extel,
RE: <<The fact that the claim is written down and the lack of proof that he wasn't the "Messiah" is not proof that he is the
"Messiah">>
Now we know why so many Bible Christians support Bush's war on Iraq. The fact that it is alleged that Saddam has or will have WMDs but Saddam has not yet disproven this allegation is all the proof they need to go to war. The reasoning is identical.

Some of us need more than that, and indeed, believe that it is a far better precendent to deal with the problem non-violently.

The precendent that this Admin will set if they do indeed go to war will come back to haunt this country. Maybe not soon. Maybe not for 50 years. But there will be some terrible blowback.

Sam

[mike_m]

<<The fact that the claim is written down and the lack of proof that he wasn't the "Messiah" is not proof that he is the "Messiah">>


Take what you want out of context, ex, but I did start this by saying:

<<Sarai, you may believe anyone you choose. Accept nothing that I or anyone else on a computer thread might say. Do your own exhaustive study.>>

Not only has no one disproven the claim but there is a preponderance of evidence that He is who He said He is. Of course if everybody had gone to the trouble of ascertaining that maybe we wouldn't be having this discussion.

[jbennett53]

extelecom, jesus was a rabblerouser. The powers that were didn't care for that and rid themselves of the trash. It will be the same if the fundamental christians gain control here.