<<The fact that the claim is written down and the lack of proof that he wasn't the "Messiah" is not proof that he is the "Messiah">>
Take what you want out of context, ex, but I did start this by saying:
<<Sarai, you may believe anyone you choose. Accept nothing that I or anyone else on a computer thread might say. Do your own exhaustive study.>>
Not only has no one disproven the claim but there is a preponderance of evidence that He is who He said He is. Of course if everybody had gone to the trouble of ascertaining that maybe we wouldn't be having this discussion.