Replies to post #36601 on eMax Holdings, Inc. (fka EMXC)

[mquattrini]

It is insane for a $50M line of credit company to be stuck with a "one man show TA"!

What is that for a company? The second far away cousin of Roxana or what?

Would you give your account to a bank with only one person running the system?

This is an absolute joke!

[priceless]

I do realize the divies are restricted but them and the New TA should be the 2 main things that everybody wants completed more than anything. Because it shows that Roxi is handling her business and that she is keeping her word unlike the way $EMXC has treated their shareholders in the past.

You say now the TA person in charge is the hospital?? Is this another ploy to drag this issue into more months or years? Do they not have a replacement? Sounds to me like its a lousy excuse to avoid these 2 main topics!

When you hear other past shareholders on this board saying they never recieved their divies and its been years ago, you start to think these guys are full of BS and they have a hidden agenda somewhere. But now since the same thing is happening to us current shareholders it makes us think there might actually be something to these accusations.

To me I see a pattern here!

If Roxi is completley being truthful with us shareholders, then why will she not provide any public information to the shareholders in regards to the new TA. I'm talking real proof and not just what she says on the phone or in a email?? I know I would be doing something if I was in her shoes just to keep the shareholders trust.

I'm even going out on a limb here........Maybe she cant because it doesnt exist! Prove me wrong Roxi, I'm big enough to say I'm sorry if I'm wrong!


-priceless

[pitts77h]

This post makes absolutely NO sense.

>>EMXC is not the only company that got screwed,

Actually, it's the shareholders that got screwed, not EMXC.

>>the Agent is hospitalized which will add to the delay.

Transfer agents are companies - not individuals. If EMXC was using a ONE MAN transfer agency, it indicates a monumental management failure on EMXC's part. Are you really saying that EMXC first chose a TA that was (possibly)criminally inept, and then moved on to a (sick) one man operation? Who IS this new TA, and why hasn't there been any company issued information about this supposed illness? HOW many years has the "transfer agent" failed to deliver promised dividends? Was he hospitalized ALL that time? Is it REALLY impossible to find a competent, legit, healthy transfer agent? OTHER companies seem to have done so, why not EMXC? This is an absurd excuse. The reality is simple - dividends have been promised for years, but not delivered. It's unlikely that this is an accident.

>>There is no rush to get the certificates... the guaranteed value [of the promised but not delivered dividends] is increasing.

WHAT "guarantee?" Any evidence of this? Who's guaranteeing the value? Why are they increasing, and how have you measured that? If you don't have the dividends, and haven't gotten them years after they were promised... and the transfer agent has apparently been sick for 8 years.... what good are they? What good is your "guarantee" if you never see the dividends?

EMXC has had YEARS to produce. They have failed. And your advice is... patience? LOL.