News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jrf30

11/02/11 11:58 AM

#27682 RE: Capt.Billy #27681

Billy,

I've got a question for you that I've not seen answered before. If you have already answered it, please let me know a second time, as I missed it.

Since we HAVE some great sites already, WHY do we go to all these new sites and try digging in new areas instead of digging on what we already know we have. I know hearing of new sites is great for our future, but why not spend some time digging on our existing ones instead of new holes looking for different things and ignoring what is in front of us already? When we had the Scipion, we stayed on that site every day and worked it to completion. WHy not do that with the two or three existing sites where we already have pulled up coins from? YOu mentioned how you took the investors to the proven site because you wanted some success while they were there and the girl pulled up a coin. Why not stay in that hole, since you know it is there and knowit produces, instead of having the crew dig new holes in new area? Do the new holes AFTER you dig out the producing one that you already have.

Seems we are leaving treasure in order to go looking for treasure. No?

icon url

Porman

11/02/11 1:04 PM

#27683 RE: Capt.Billy #27681

Actually sounds alot like Southern Louisiana. If it was easy and cheap wed all be out digging in the ocean for treasure. I can see the attraction of a 60 foot wreck. Stay safe and choot em. Der be gold im dem waters.