I disagree completely. You're being super simplistic and not thinking about the issues here. M-Partners target is based on a buyout value. The Barclays analyst's target isn't. Other analysts have different target prices. The firewall means the Barclays analyst might as well be from XYZ brokerage. The consortia and companies looking at purchasing IDCC aren't kids. They know this stuff. Why are some shareholders being so naive as to ignore the big picture? Stay calm and let the process come to its conclusion.
It's kinda of tough to make some acquirer pay $75 per share when your own analyst sets a pt of $45?
B&G...back to your usual games of trying to sow FUD?You certainly know that the Barkley's analyst made her analysis 'purely" on the actual revenue numbers.She didn't downgrade the shareprice but kept it at the same price it was before $45.
You also know that Shuttleworths numbers are based on a projected buyout price.
You are mixing the two because your agenda here is to sow FUD.You privately email me to try and create more FUD.
Just be upfront and stay within your Navatar..Doom and Gloom..we get it.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
