Replies to post #36455 on Wanderport Corp (WDRP)

[Wander_more]

The other thing to consider is that they wouldnt be propelling a lie about the unit actually working when they have a company like UL working on testing the unit. UL simply wouldnt put their credibility on the line for these guys. So, we can assume for now they are telling the truth about claims on the unit.

[erin2000]

Excellent post nyra. I'll say it again, the company is doing this to honor a "promise" made by Dave Myers. They don't have to do this at all and just wait until its fully ready to launch but they are giving us an opportunity for a first hand look, albeit may not be fired up ( sure they have their reason). As you pointed out, if this is all a well orchestrated scam, UL design1st, UMC etc would have bailed.

[wyoskeptic]

Great post NYRA. I'm in the same boat with you. Show us a finished unit. Explain the components. Give us a detailed technical analysis of the preliminary testing. Explain the cost of manufacturing and projected costs to own/operate vs competition. Give us some hard facts on what the business plan is going to be going forward. Bonus points for whatever surprises they have in store.
I have been an ardent supporter of WDRP since I bought my first shares almost 2 years ago. But the lack of common sense and logic do start to be bothersome. Come on, WDRP let's get our collective
act together and get er done!!!
Still long and strong.

[BeerIsGood]

Yes, that would be awesome! It could also be accomplished very easily on a website.

and have Robert discuss the measurements and their comparisons to the competition as well as point out all of the competitive advantages. I'd want to know what the cost projections are (price to customer as well as total cost of ownership). . . . Just give me the measured efficiencies and other relevant technical data and I'm happy.