your argument is unbalanced, as usual - you just can't see both sides of a debate and judge them in an unbiased way.
you know i don't care for barny fwank's lifestyle - ted k lost his chance at being president because of chappaquidick - you think i condone these things? but we like those guys despite their failings because of the good they've done.
don't lump all massachusettsians into the same boat.
i can see the tea party's agenda objectively - they make some good points, but all-in-all, they're loonies - bringing the country to the brink of default while the matter should have been settled months ago - their intransigence, their my way or the highway attitude doesn't do the country any good - perry said he wouldn't have signed the debt ceiling bill, what? plunging the national and world economies into turmoil - nice