Replies to post #97038 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[mahatmapaul]

It is IMPOSSIBLE for a float to trade over a dozen times in 4 days...impossible, impossible, impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why don't js, 4kids, veno, et al. address this issue?

veno, 4kids: How is it possible for the float to have traded over a dozen times in 4 days, without massive selling of the 850 million shares insiders held?

Please answer this question.

Your continued failure to do so invalidates all of your fuzzy and tiresome claims that "insiders have not sold their shares." Renee has shown that what transpired is impossible without massive selling by insiders. Now, please explain why you do not agree with Renee. No more tables of daily transactions, no more "we'll agree to disagree", no more obfuscations, misdirections, reliance on hearsay(!). Renee has added 2 + 2 + 6 and has gotten 10. Please explain where the fault in her calculations lies. In the absence of that, then please explain how you can continue believing the nonsense that you do.

It's a very simple question. How is it POSSIBLE for the float to have traded over a dozen times in 4 days without insiders selling into the P&D?

Selling by insiders into a P&D is seriously illegal and unethical. JD and his ilk are crooks, and the evidence has been there for quite some time, for anyone who thinks logically.

While you're at it, please explain how it is NOT ABSOLUTE INANITY to believe that any investor could be so stupid as to try to short a .000x non-reporting pinky. If you brought this up with any professional investor, they would be dumbstruck at the inanity. Also, please explain why you do not agree with the SEC on this issue (it's very very dangerous to hold theories that the SEC does not agree with; any newbies reading this: consider that you may be taking advice from people who disagree with actual policies of the SEC. How is THAT going to make you money?)

And while you're at it, please explain how, after 50 weeks into the fiscal year (read: 14 days before the fiscal year ended), JD's assertion that revenues would be as promised, only to actually come in at -74%, was not a lie, pure and simple. Can you imagine what response you would get if you brought up this issue with any person with any knowledge of bookkeeping and finance? Just as with the previous question, they would probably be dumbstruck (meaning they've been struck by something very very dumb)

Please answer the above questions.

1.

2.

3.

Fill in your answers. Keep them focused, precise, and to the point.

We await your responses. Your failure to do so will be proof that all of your defenses of JD and his "integrity" are a house of cards.

thank you for your attention to these questions.

[fourkids_9pets]

really renee ~

i didn't confuse an unregistered co. on the OTC
with anything connected to the big boards

the OTC has been poorly watched .. as such rigged
aspects are endemic .. which of course is exactly
what happened from may to sept 2009 on expo

regardless and per your *post* from july 26th 2009
posted earlier .. the vetting done by facilities like
wachovia .. so. comm bank and crestmark would be that
much more *stringent* by july 2009 than even one year
earlier .. the fact is expo retains quality customers
has *adjusted* where needed and still has relationships
with all 3 financial institutions <noted> in that post
from 2 yrs back .. <edit> to this day :)

not too shabby and more than anything *refutes* what is posted

==

Smart investors knew to get out of EXPH between .013 cents to.035 cents when the game changer ETC was a farce of grand proportions, and smart investors knew that about 800 million volume in 2 days
and well over a billion in 4 days contradicted EXPO's claims that they weren't selling. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a float to trade over a dozen times in 4 days...impossible, impossible, impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

==
absolute nonsense

and
nothing that hasn't been *observed* many times over on the OTC

'cos when it comes to unregistered legit co.s on the OTC and
entities with multiple accts wash trading their way thru *volume*
that too can be *accomplished* and was done on exph from may to
sept 2009

==

i was extolled to do comps .. i did so and discovered that
for an unregistered co. .. expo holdings is remarkably transparent

their SS while not ideal is not horrific either .. again i look
for balance and thankfully have real world experience to understand
that aspects always take far longer and usually cost more than
originally estimated .. then factor in a non seasoned mgmt team
<specifically as a public entity 2+ years back>

who were facing the worst economic times this country has seen
in over 70 years .. who not only survived they did so with logic
so this *investor* who actually holds shares will cut mgmt some
slack because i can understand how one aspect could impact many
others

i've also said from the very start .. that all should wait for
their respective clarity to come to pass .. my caveats are met
my comfort level is met and i have zero doubts about mgmt's
integrity

==
4kids
all jmo