Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[fourkids_9pets]

really renee ~

i didn't confuse an unregistered co. on the OTC
with anything connected to the big boards

the OTC has been poorly watched .. as such rigged
aspects are endemic .. which of course is exactly
what happened from may to sept 2009 on expo

regardless and per your *post* from july 26th 2009
posted earlier .. the vetting done by facilities like
wachovia .. so. comm bank and crestmark would be that
much more *stringent* by july 2009 than even one year
earlier .. the fact is expo retains quality customers
has *adjusted* where needed and still has relationships
with all 3 financial institutions <noted> in that post
from 2 yrs back .. <edit> to this day :)

not too shabby and more than anything *refutes* what is posted

==

Smart investors knew to get out of EXPH between .013 cents to.035 cents when the game changer ETC was a farce of grand proportions, and smart investors knew that about 800 million volume in 2 days
and well over a billion in 4 days contradicted EXPO's claims that they weren't selling. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a float to trade over a dozen times in 4 days...impossible, impossible, impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

==
absolute nonsense

and
nothing that hasn't been *observed* many times over on the OTC

'cos when it comes to unregistered legit co.s on the OTC and
entities with multiple accts wash trading their way thru *volume*
that too can be *accomplished* and was done on exph from may to
sept 2009

==

i was extolled to do comps .. i did so and discovered that
for an unregistered co. .. expo holdings is remarkably transparent

their SS while not ideal is not horrific either .. again i look
for balance and thankfully have real world experience to understand
that aspects always take far longer and usually cost more than
originally estimated .. then factor in a non seasoned mgmt team
<specifically as a public entity 2+ years back>

who were facing the worst economic times this country has seen
in over 70 years .. who not only survived they did so with logic
so this *investor* who actually holds shares will cut mgmt some
slack because i can understand how one aspect could impact many
others

i've also said from the very start .. that all should wait for
their respective clarity to come to pass .. my caveats are met
my comfort level is met and i have zero doubts about mgmt's
integrity

==
4kids
all jmo