Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:35:50 AM
It is IMPOSSIBLE for a float to trade over a dozen times in 4 days...impossible, impossible, impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why don't js, 4kids, veno, et al. address this issue?
veno, 4kids: How is it possible for the float to have traded over a dozen times in 4 days, without massive selling of the 850 million shares insiders held?
Please answer this question.
Your continued failure to do so invalidates all of your fuzzy and tiresome claims that "insiders have not sold their shares." Renee has shown that what transpired is impossible without massive selling by insiders. Now, please explain why you do not agree with Renee. No more tables of daily transactions, no more "we'll agree to disagree", no more obfuscations, misdirections, reliance on hearsay(!). Renee has added 2 + 2 + 6 and has gotten 10. Please explain where the fault in her calculations lies. In the absence of that, then please explain how you can continue believing the nonsense that you do.
It's a very simple question. How is it POSSIBLE for the float to have traded over a dozen times in 4 days without insiders selling into the P&D?
Selling by insiders into a P&D is seriously illegal and unethical. JD and his ilk are crooks, and the evidence has been there for quite some time, for anyone who thinks logically.
While you're at it, please explain how it is NOT ABSOLUTE INANITY to believe that any investor could be so stupid as to try to short a .000x non-reporting pinky. If you brought this up with any professional investor, they would be dumbstruck at the inanity. Also, please explain why you do not agree with the SEC on this issue (it's very very dangerous to hold theories that the SEC does not agree with; any newbies reading this: consider that you may be taking advice from people who disagree with actual policies of the SEC. How is THAT going to make you money?)
And while you're at it, please explain how, after 50 weeks into the fiscal year (read: 14 days before the fiscal year ended), JD's assertion that revenues would be as promised, only to actually come in at -74%, was not a lie, pure and simple. Can you imagine what response you would get if you brought up this issue with any person with any knowledge of bookkeeping and finance? Just as with the previous question, they would probably be dumbstruck (meaning they've been struck by something very very dumb)
Please answer the above questions.
1.
2.
3.
Fill in your answers. Keep them focused, precise, and to the point.
We await your responses. Your failure to do so will be proof that all of your defenses of JD and his "integrity" are a house of cards.
thank you for your attention to these questions.
