News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Britpack

05/03/11 11:22 AM

#233004 RE: chiefwiggim24 #233003

Joe is the CEO, on whose authority, who is the 'they' that voted him in? Joe is no more the CEO than you or I am at this point in time. By the time all this is resolved, maybe Joe will be CEO, who knows, who cares, I will be gone from this stinking pig like a lot of our fellow shareholders!
icon url

dehydratedman

05/03/11 11:24 AM

#233005 RE: chiefwiggim24 #233003

Back away from the peace pipe Chief...So what you are saying if I make a filing with the Colorado SOS you will bow down to me a the new CEO? Like it or not?

I think it's great the you refer to yourself in the third party...perhaps there is one of you that believes what you say...

GeneO

PS...Brit, here is who elected Joey as CEOy... http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62676454
icon url

packerfan9

05/03/11 11:56 AM

#233012 RE: chiefwiggim24 #233003

Chief what part of the judge has not made the ruling yet is not clear? You or Joe saying that doesn't change court will decide that. Until they do Jeff is CEO since last Dec. Is changing that valid is what court case is about. Until that is decided don't tell us Joe is CEO when facts say otherwise. His last 2 filings haven't been recognized because it is up to courts. TA won't issue any new shares or increase a/s until they see judges ruling.
icon url

Bigdogs

05/03/11 12:02 PM

#233014 RE: chiefwiggim24 #233003

Doesnt matter who is CEO and the Judge will decide who is in charge not you or anyone else NOONE is to make any decisions or file PRS or create Filings until the Court decides.

As far as Im concerned Jeff is CEO until proven by the courts he is not

Joe has already broken the law once from his fake filing the other day because it was never authorized and illegal because the judge clearly stated NO business Decisions

This has been made clear.

Getting nervous / I would be
icon url

sphistak

05/03/11 12:08 PM

#233016 RE: chiefwiggim24 #233003

And of course there will be "reasonable" excuses from many here when everything is delayed as usual....
icon url

Bigdogs

05/03/11 12:13 PM

#233020 RE: chiefwiggim24 #233003

Please tell your fearless Leader to answer these questions

You keep saying he is in charge well lets see the answers to these questions then.

Why dont you push this CHIEF


Joe,

As a Pretend CEO until the Judge officially agrees with you, you have the Fiduciary responsibility to Act in All the Shareholders Interests and we want answers to all of the Questions listed below?

What is the Main Number we can reach you at?

Who is the Current IR we can address questions to?

What is the current office location you and your management team are occupying so we can visit to see what our money is paying for?

What is the Current Board of Directors?

You do know that you already ignored the Judges order for No business to be conducted until a Decision is made. Why did you blatantly ignore the Law and have your fake board vote you in?



Why would you wait to see what centacom does? I thought the company (according to you ) had nothing to do with centacom. Why dont you pr a good reason for qasp shareholders to support quasar?

Where can the Shareholders come visit you at to get some direct answers?

Is this statement true? ".Dean owns and trades an offshore fund. Joe was his partner. Joe even listed Dean a a reference on his "wifes" site...LOL "

Why don't you share with all the shareholders why you need another 1.5 BILLION shares in the AS?

Why are you threatening to put out a PR if Centacom announces a proposed stock swap when this is just a choice for shareholders and not yourself?

Doesnt all your Preferreds from the past since they had NO voting rights mean that the filings and bogus Prs were fraudulent since they were voted on and there were no Voting rights?

Why did you Issue New Voting Rights? Doesnt this just tell everyone that the old Voting rights mean Jeff is still in Control since they were Fraudulently done and had no Voting rights to make any of those past filings legal?

Are there any current negotiations going on with Kwan that the shareholders dont know about?

Have you contacted Mineseeker to bring Value to QASP?

Can you please list every family member both in the Past and the current that have been involved with QASP and what there roles are and were?

Joe if you really are the CEO like you said you are you fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interests of the shareholders.
What is your plan to bring value to us with No Dilution?

Do you understand that there are current Legal proceedings going on and that No Business Operations are to be performed by either parties until the Judge makes his Decisions?
In a nut shell, can you explain what has been going on for about the last year? Specifically address you stepping down, the increased shares, the preffereds and the possible merger that is being talked about.

Next, I want to know if you think that I am going to show any 'profit' from my investment into this company? It seems you were in control for a long time...especially when I became a shareholder, so you would have been the one responsible for maximizing the shareholder value. Why has that not happened?

In your opinion, am i ever going to see a profit in this company, or should I just sell out and take my losses?

After this whole court case(s) are finished and if you are still the one as the CEO, what are your plans to make the investors...shareholders...all of us... glas that we invested our hard earned money into this company run by you?

It is your Fiduciary responsibility to answer all of these questions?

Are you involved with Toxic Funding and have you ever done any with QASP?

Do you have any friends or Coworkers that are posting on this board and what is your relationship with them?

Now that your acting as a CEO do you have any knowledge and have you partnered with and assisted Dean with a Offshore Fund to bet against our QASP shares by Shorting them?

I sure hope this isnt proven because having a CEO that is betting against our investments would be equivalent to a Baseball player betting on his team to lose and gambling against his own stock?

Please reassure us you have No involvement in Any Offshore Accounts are that you are not associated with anyone that does that could effect our investments?

And last of all as a Shareholder of QASP I am extremely disturbed by your statement "QASP IS TOAST"

Can you please let all shareholders know your intent on this statement?