News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Agent92260

04/19/11 11:54 AM

#59835 RE: necktoeye #59796

Thank you Neck, I appreciate the forth-coming post. Not sure why it took so long, but I appreciate it either way. I respect that you can discuss it openly now.

ownership stays the same after split.
% drops in correlation to, if and when ,the a/s is used to acquire other companies and grow the company.



I think we're starting to get closer to the same page here as holders. You're a numbers guy, based on our current PPS, after the split, how many shares do you think will be used for the CCMEX deal? I know you mentioned it COULD be from an investor, IDK either, but with the concept that its from these shares, how many do you think would be used? (Just a rough guess-timate is fine)

I also understand that once we've surmised (hypnotized) shares are likely to be used, 'how many' is just an assumption. I will not hold your feet to the fire if the numbers end up different then we discuss today.

Thanks
icon url

Starlost

04/19/11 1:40 PM

#59843 RE: necktoeye #59796

Let's be clear about this.
The increase in A/S is for one thing only, so Matt can dilute the stock more. This dilution is to be used for completing deals like CMEX, but it's also being used for company operations including paying his employess, not to mention himself and his wife. There are no if ands or buts about it, DILUTION IS A FACT.

ownership stays the same after split.
% drops in correlation to, if and when ,the a/s is used to acquire other companies and grow the company.