News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Ruffieruff

04/04/11 1:48 PM

#30313 RE: billpr #30311

Its all a con. Screw the shareholders! The thing that makes me nervous is how many of Ferris friends own shares and will vote yes? Do we really have a chance to defeat this??
icon url

stockguy1000

04/04/11 1:53 PM

#30314 RE: billpr #30311

Because to commit to an uplist could open himself and the management up to legal liabilities / and a forced timeline. Under the Business Judgment Rule, managment can decide to uplist at the drop of a hat. There is no reason to state your intention to uplist in a proxy. If I were their lawyer, I would specifically tell them not to commit to an uplist in the proxy, its foolish, and they have nothing to gain by doing so. It also forces a timeline, and sets them up for investor dissapointment if the timeline is not met. If there are no definitive plans (and definitive plans include an uplist timeline) then they would write in the proxy, no uplist plans are definitive. Now they can move at a pace they are comfortable with.

I am taking my assumption of an uplist from a multitude of circumstantial factors, its the only way to make money in this game.