Its just common sense, nothing more. Mistakenly the against-voters are associated with "fear" and "negative".
We just want a better solution which is as well in the company's interest as in the shareholders interest.
Why should we vote yes implying voting against ourselves ?
The current proposals are an insult to the shareholders and accordingly to their intelligence.
Sure,creating visually more value for the stock by R/Splitting to dollars-range on the PINKS, thinking about some audited financials somewhere in the future and uplisting , thats something not needed at this point, but also somewhere in the future. Come on!
Sounds like interesting actions points, but executed in the wrong order !
We want guarantees as being such loyal shareholders we are !
1) audited financials
2) uplisting to a higher tier
3) optionally a R/S
All points embraced by "let's not forget this one" = creating shareholder value.
Sincerely
The Vote-No-Front
K.