News Focus
News Focus
icon url

4on4off

03/28/11 1:24 PM

#638 RE: ryjbench #637

Not 100% certain. I am looking over patent information for others places here:

http://www.mirandah.com/Patent_System_in_Indonesia.aspx

There are links for patent system info for places such as indonesia, thailand, philipines, india etc.....

so far the first one I looked at for indonesia says:

Non-patentable subject matter

Any process or product that contravenes the prevailing rules and regulations, religious morality, public order or ethics
Methods of examination, treatment, medication, and/or surgery applied to humans and /or animal
Discoveries or scientific theories
Mathematical formulae
Living creatures, (except micro-organism)
Biological processes for reproduction of plants and animals

I don't think that is the same as in the china info I posted. I am still looking at the other.


Interesting though.

4
icon url

hedge_fun

03/28/11 1:47 PM

#642 RE: ryjbench #637

So in this weeks filing we will see the TERMS?

Case solved?

thx
icon url

tommy 9 fingers

03/28/11 2:02 PM

#645 RE: ryjbench #637

but you said Carl wouldn't invest $16 million on a plant with out a patent and risk so much of shareholders money.

So how does this solve the IPR issue?

It actually shows more that Carl needs a big company to buy him out more than anything else.

Someone who actually has the money to move fast enough to squash any competition.

But then again if there is no patent why would they need to deal with Carl..

The best thing Carl has going for him is that he can sell a shell to a non-public company that has a highly promoted grass that might not have a patent.



icon url

hedge_fun

12/19/11 12:39 PM

#1909 RE: ryjbench #637

Solve it? Doesn't it validate what the filings say?

If no patents are given, how can you have IP protections? That's what VGREF/VSPC files. Are you saying they are lying?

TIA