Replies to post #561 on VIASPACE Green Energy Inc (VGREF)

[tommy 9 fingers]

Funny thing is rybench is that while debating this company some posters have said it is illegal to "bash" while trading or shorting a stock and that is correct it can be as proven by many new headlines of investgations etc...

But it is also illegal to "pump" while trading a stock or selling 144 shares as evidence by the many news article etc, etc.

So it's funny that one side complains of people asking questions about filing requirements while the other make outlandish statements like " they could have a 1000 acres we don't know about" especially after one side shows that the buying or leasing of land like that would be considered a material event and require an 8K filing or a PR

Better yet is a statement on one site with that tag line being "DP and VSPC deal soon" .. I wonder if that individual is selling shares he bought at .008 from Dr.K when he was selling less than a month ago now at the .015 or about a 90% profit ..lol ... ironic don't you think yest he slams those you question the PR's...LOL

Why can't we just debate the merit or lack of them in this stock?

Please, I respect your opinion in what you say here "They created a company we just found out about and is over a year old, wasnt in the filings or PR'd"

But please just show me a link or site or quote or regulation as to why you think that is allowable for a public company to do that with out filing.

Especially when Dr. K knew what I think IMO and backed up with the SEC regs as to why I think this that he was selling shares while in possesion of what could be considered material event information since 07/23/2011 and more material event information of this Feb with the hiring of Patrick and info regarding the possible leaving of the Director of production Wang who has started his own public company which is another material event IMO if Wang is still employed by VGE all this in IMO and I am not an expert, but all the reading I have about material event suggest these are legit question to ask.

So agian please somebody show me a regulation etc as to why these events are not considered material events.

[hedge_fun]

Sherman, you have an issue with the SEC, not me.

The SEC notes that, in those cases where SEC rules do not require the filing of a Form 8-K, Nasdaq rules still require an issuer to make public disclosures through a press release.

VGE Singapore was PR'd, as was RuBa. Why were those events NOT significant enough to require a filing?

It could be that they weren't. But a PR was still required. I guess the fact that VGREF may not have wholly owned VGE Singapore UNTIL the officers were in place exempted them from the PR until 3/1.

http://www.viaspace.com/press_article.php?id=1332

http://www.viaspace.com/press_article.php?id=1312

Why don't you actually provide a LINK that shows public companies do not have to disclose the growth of operations to shareholders, such as planting 3 times more GKG than they currently have in another country.

Or just explain how it wouldn't fall under the definition of significant.

The 279 acres in China is in the filings, along with the lease agreement and expenses.

Thx in advance for participating.