News Focus
News Focus
Followers 523
Posts 62976
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: ryjbench post# 561

Wednesday, 03/23/2011 12:22:06 PM

Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:22:06 PM

Post# of 2281
Sherman, you have an issue with the SEC, not me.

The SEC notes that, in those cases where SEC rules do not require the filing of a Form 8-K, Nasdaq rules still require an issuer to make public disclosures through a press release.

VGE Singapore was PR'd, as was RuBa. Why were those events NOT significant enough to require a filing?

It could be that they weren't. But a PR was still required. I guess the fact that VGREF may not have wholly owned VGE Singapore UNTIL the officers were in place exempted them from the PR until 3/1.

http://www.viaspace.com/press_article.php?id=1332

http://www.viaspace.com/press_article.php?id=1312

Why don't you actually provide a LINK that shows public companies do not have to disclose the growth of operations to shareholders, such as planting 3 times more GKG than they currently have in another country.

Or just explain how it wouldn't fall under the definition of significant.

The 279 acres in China is in the filings, along with the lease agreement and expenses.

Thx in advance for participating.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today