Replies to post #4973 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[BigBake1]

I find this statement interesting:

Eade's case contends that certain posters on Investors Hub are paid to tout or criticize stocks. This practice could violate SEC regulations which require stock promotion compensation to be disclosed.

How long before he gets phone calls from shell owners and CEOs telling him to shut his piehole? Because that is what he would be digging into, strictly compensated posters from companies. But just the everyday poster does not fit his charge of compensated opinion.

[sunspotter]

"then less abuses would occur," said Eade."

For heaven's sake, Kenneth, "fewer", not "less"!

I can almost forgive the fact you're both a crook and an incompetent and dishonest lawyer with a history that would make Groucho Marx in A Night at the Opera look like a first class attorney:

"Groucho: It's all right. That's, that's in every contract. That's, that's what they call a sanity clause.
Chico: Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! You can't fool me. There ain't no Sanity Clause!"

but such blatant abuse of the English language will never be acceptable.