News Focus
News Focus
icon url

pantherj

02/25/11 3:09 AM

#4955 RE: nodummy #4944

Until two weeks ago, when other priorities cropped up, I was a frequent and vocal basher on that board. Here is what i remember about all the hocus pocus, now you see 'em, now you don't crap going on.

First: The Series A preferred shares: The number of preferred shares held by Gallagher is mentioned, as I remember, in three different places in the financials. First the number is given as 270,000 shares and twice it is given as 270 shares. However, in the narrative it becomes crystal clear that 270,000 is the correct number and common shareholders are warned that, when Gallagher converts, this will result in substantial dilution. Thats 2,700,000,000 common shares! And Gallagher will convert ... he will get his. Of that one can be certain.

Second: When EYSM purchased Directory.com, the price was $1,000,000.00; payable either by shares, or cash, or a combination at EYSM's option. Obviously, there is no cash to work with right now so it'll almost certainly be in shares. OUCH!! that's a lot of shares.

Third: There are many other debt holders which have the right to convert to shares, also (I don't recall the exact amount of these debts. In fact, a precise amount may not have been given in the financials) At any rate, it all adds up to more dilution

Fourth: in the body of the report, EYSM is very upfront in telling shareholders (None of whom will even bother to read the report) that the company fully intends to raise $750,000.00 - $800,000.00 this year via share sales.

Fifth: Adding up all the potential dilution from the above sources shows that the OS could be diluted by as much 4,000,000,000+ more shares this year.

But Gallagher made a pretty smart move! After I had brought up all these points for many weeks, Gallagher issued a series of PRs addressing almost all of them.

A) No reverse split .... this year

B) Debt holders have agreed not to convert until at least April, at which time they will renegotiate

C) No further dilution of any kind until at least April (I'm betting that proves to be untrue as as the volume has been as high as 1/2 Billion shares in a day ... but who is to know with a gagged TA)

D) As a final touch, Gallagher also has consistently issued PRs touting the positive results of their new sales campaign.

Summation: I think Gallagher has hit upon a business plan that could work. But, it will never accrue to the benefit of share holders because of dilution, a mountain of past debt and the Series A preferred shares.

Plus, how much longer can this little run last when the company has as good as told shareholders that it all goes to heck again after April.

icon url

janice shell

02/25/11 2:31 PM

#4973 RE: nodummy #4944

Our friend Eade appears to want to try his case in the press rather than in court.

Investors Hub Served in Multi Million Dollar Libel Case; Motion Filed to Unmask Alias Posters

Fri Feb 25, 9:00 am ET

Attorney Kenneth Eade files Motion for Expedited Discovery for Indentities of Doe Defendants
Los Angeles, California (PRWEB) February 25, 2011

Attorney Kenneth Eade announced today that Investorshub.com has been served with the summons and complaint in his multi million dollar libel case , case number CV11-01315PA, on February 14, 2011. A motion for expedited discovery was filed on February 21, 2011, requesting the court to allow plaintiff to discover information regarding the identity and whereabouts of Doe defendants before the Rule 26 early meeting of counsel. "The Internet is a wonderful tool to share information and exercise free speech, but its abuse occurs when people use it to hurt others," said Eade. "Libelous speech is not protected by the constitution and the most damage occurs when speakers shirk responsibility by hiding behind annonymous made up names," he added. "Our discovery will be designed to unmask the posters."

The motion asks the court to expedite discovery so that the plaintiff can uncover the identity of Doe defendants before the time normally allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. "If stock bulletin boards were forced to reveal the identities of their posters, then less abuses would occur," said Eade. "I have received many emails from people who are concerned about annonymous posters who attempt to "pump" a stock on the boards by praising over the counter traded companies, as well as those who are concerned with 'bashing' a company, a process where annonymous posters post negative things about a company in an attempt to depress its stock price," he said. "The mainstream press has a set of ethics and rules to follow. Unfortunately, there is no code of ethics for annonymous posters." Eade's case contends that certain posters on Investors Hub are paid to tout or criticize stocks. This practice could violate SEC regulations which require stock promotion compensation to be disclosed. The SEC provides information to investors about Internet stock fraud practices at http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/cyberfraud.htm.
###

KENNETH EADE

3237828802
Email Information

http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20110225/bs_prweb/prweb5100214_1