Replies to post #52065 on CBA Florida Inc. (fka CBAI)

[sfraven1466]

The DW info is bogus. Neck says it was against the idea of the whole court DW connection presented.

Simple. If we made two offers for ALL of Cryo-cell in 2010, and DW made 2 offers as well, why was only DW's offer PRed? Isn't our offer considered a significant event as well? Either DW made the offer for us, or we made an offer and Cryo-Cell did not inform shareholders. None of this is important though, what IS important is the FACT THAT WE MADE AN OFFER TO BUY ALL OF CRYO-CELL! this would mean we have the funds to buy ALL of Cryo-Cell, Cryo-Mexico is a strategic move to get Cryo-Cell to give in. OUR TARGET IS CRYO-CELL, the WHOLE COMPANY.

Matt Schissler I can't comment other than what was said in court, which is we made 2 attempts to purchase CCEL in 2010, both were rejected

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/matt.schissler/posts/495040604177

There is no Dismissal listed on the FL docket. In court they close dockets that are dismissals not add to them.

Matt Schissler Cord Blood America, Investors Forum
The case was dismissed and injunction not granted. That's the technical result. The Plaintiff is allowed for file an amendment to the case and resubmit. But todays case is officially dismissed. We did set a new trial date, but that is only if the defendant does file that amendment in the stated time frame, which would trigger a new case. The date for the new trial would be the 25th of February if the plaintiff does file the amendment.


What more information do you need? I believe we are witnessing a HOSTILE TAKEOVER. We have the funds, that is a fact. We made two offers for CRYO-CELL, that is a fact. Cryo-Cell Mexico is the proverbial "Check Mate". How can we make an offer for Cryo-Cell, but not have funds for a small arm of the company?? Who cares to disagree with this? This is my solution for your discarded stems theory.


HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF CRYO-CELL...WE HAVE THE FUNDS...MARK THIS POST

[necktoeye]

The proposal does what it is intended to do. Break shareholder confidence. Why, is that necessary? Is anyone giddy to take a 500:1 RS? A few claim they are ready to go down that road but can't answer the Qs asked. Some have for me shown they have no credibility. The DW and court reporting info is tainted. It is all lies. There is no Dismissal listed on the FL docket. In court they close dockets that are dismissals not add to them

credibility huh. Well lets see what was reported on here shall we!!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58804743

Great news. Case was almost dismissed. Judge would like to hear witness testimony and that CC de Mex be joined in the hearing. Dr. Oneil was very pleased with the outcome of the hearing. Mr. Schissler said that was a great outcome for CBAI. New court date is Febuary 25th 2011. We will be providing a more detailed up...date for the FB as soon as we transcribe our notes. All in all thumbs up.
See More
January 14 at 8:13am ·LikeUnlike ·

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58805141

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58806163


first mention of DW in response to Morley
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58811865

2+2 post read it!!!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58840621

I LOVE THIS ONE in reponse to you
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58865069

Now I would post your statements regarding DW/ CBAI relationship but there are to many.

Those are most of mine thou.
Now for as the relationship with DW and CBAI I will still stand by my word and say I don't know. They have never been mentioned in any PR or link, like I said before.

You however made a great case for the relationship.

Have a great day