CBA Florida Inc. (fka CBAI)

[sfraven1466]

The DW info is bogus. Neck says it was against the idea of the whole court DW connection presented.

Simple. If we made two offers for ALL of Cryo-cell in 2010, and DW made 2 offers as well, why was only DW's offer PRed? Isn't our offer considered a significant event as well? Either DW made the offer for us, or we made an offer and Cryo-Cell did not inform shareholders. None of this is important though, what IS important is the FACT THAT WE MADE AN OFFER TO BUY ALL OF CRYO-CELL! this would mean we have the funds to buy ALL of Cryo-Cell, Cryo-Mexico is a strategic move to get Cryo-Cell to give in. OUR TARGET IS CRYO-CELL, the WHOLE COMPANY.

Matt Schissler I can't comment other than what was said in court, which is we made 2 attempts to purchase CCEL in 2010, both were rejected

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/matt.schissler/posts/495040604177

There is no Dismissal listed on the FL docket. In court they close dockets that are dismissals not add to them.

Matt Schissler Cord Blood America, Investors Forum
The case was dismissed and injunction not granted. That's the technical result. The Plaintiff is allowed for file an amendment to the case and resubmit. But todays case is officially dismissed. We did set a new trial date, but that is only if the defendant does file that amendment in the stated time frame, which would trigger a new case. The date for the new trial would be the 25th of February if the plaintiff does file the amendment.


What more information do you need? I believe we are witnessing a HOSTILE TAKEOVER. We have the funds, that is a fact. We made two offers for CRYO-CELL, that is a fact. Cryo-Cell Mexico is the proverbial "Check Mate". How can we make an offer for Cryo-Cell, but not have funds for a small arm of the company?? Who cares to disagree with this? This is my solution for your discarded stems theory.


HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF CRYO-CELL...WE HAVE THE FUNDS...MARK THIS POST