Replies to post #153205 on CMKM Diamonds Inc (fka CMKX)

[Sportsjunkie]

even at one time nevada and utah also had special
loopholes,which would make sense on where this company
was registered in..

[janice shell]

Speaking of opinion letters....

While rational discourse is rarely possible on the RB CMKX board, every once in awhile someone posts interesting information. Remember back last summer, when several people posting here claimed that Wells Fargo wouldn't let them buy CMKX because of Blue Skies problems?

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3568329
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3569093

I brought that up on the RB board the other day, and got this reply:

By: DDPro
25 Mar 2005, 01:08 PM EST
Msg. 867022 of 869640
(This msg. is a reply to 866996 by Janiceshell.)
Jump to msg. #  

You can pull links out of your butt all day long to support you implied contention that WF was no longer selling CMKX. I bought thru WF this week... fact. Yes, in 2004 for a short period of time, WF had a hold on buys until RG straightened them out on the Blue Sky issue. That hold was rescinded in just a matter of weeks and they have since sold 100's of millions of CMKX shares.

DDPro

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKX&read=867022

Does this mean that Glenn wrote an opinion letter informing Wells Fargo that CMKX stock was indeed registered? If so, did he do the same for other brokerages?

Trouble is, CMKX now says that most of it wasn't registered.