Replies to post #123321 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[Gotcha Sucka]

Let's just say we're current in the filings. Accuracy will be determined by the absence of an amended 10Q. The company historically amends. Filings, by the way, are not the sum total of what the SEC considers when determining compliance. You and I may see what we think is credible management now. Are you sure that's what the SEC sees?

I've added to my original investment over the years and am in the black. I've also sold a little off mainly when Terdberg and friends pump it up a little to sell some of their own. We wouldnt be here if we all weren't risktakers, and if you believe it's worth the risk to accumulate more, good luck to you. I'm just thinking there's a deadline they're not going to hit.

[WildWest]

Warp, we can always count on you to provide a well reasoned post- well said!

I agree completely and have a buy order for tomorrow morning.

[mide]

Warp. As one of the posters who believes that de-listing is possible, I have to ask you about your post, in reverse order.

1. <Civil fines certainly, but revocation of shares? Well, if I thought that, I certainly wouldn't be buying shares. And I still believe there will be a settlement before the trial date.>

As I understand, the final settlement date is tomorrow or next Friday at the latest. Why do believe there will be a settlement?
On what facts?

2. <The SEC has no grounds to revoke shares at this point in the proceedings. >

Warp...on what legal grounds do you make this claim? The rest of that paragraph is your sole opine.

3. <we are current and accurate in the filings. >

On this sole opinion you hang your hat that we are clear and clean to go. After Seifert, whose financials have already been corrected in a filing by the newbies for not showing all the shares passed out, and released, are YOU really certain all of his filings previously made are "accurate"?

Get back at your leisure.

m