News Focus
News Focus
Followers 61
Posts 4371
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/26/2005

Re: WarpCore61 post# 123321

Thursday, 08/19/2010 7:12:05 PM

Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:12:05 PM

Post# of 157300
Warp. As one of the posters who believes that de-listing is possible, I have to ask you about your post, in reverse order.

1. <Civil fines certainly, but revocation of shares? Well, if I thought that, I certainly wouldn't be buying shares. And I still believe there will be a settlement before the trial date.>

As I understand, the final settlement date is tomorrow or next Friday at the latest. Why do believe there will be a settlement?
On what facts?

2. <The SEC has no grounds to revoke shares at this point in the proceedings. >

Warp...on what legal grounds do you make this claim? The rest of that paragraph is your sole opine.

3. <we are current and accurate in the filings. >

On this sole opinion you hang your hat that we are clear and clean to go. After Seifert, whose financials have already been corrected in a filing by the newbies for not showing all the shares passed out, and released, are YOU really certain all of his filings previously made are "accurate"?

Get back at your leisure.

m


"Great Spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds " A.Edison... Before dawn there is darkness, then the sun rises.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today